Quick Answer
Common Misconceptions About Bifacial Solar Technology include thinking bifacial panels have to be mounted on trackers or have a specific orientation to work effectively; and that the benefits of bifacial panels are limited to large-scale solar farms, when in fact, they can be effectively used in a variety of settings.
Bifacial Panel Myths
Bifacial solar panels are often misunderstood as requiring a specific orientation or tracking system to function. In reality, bifacial panels can be installed on fixed-tilt mounts and still produce significant gains in energy output. For example, a study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) found that bifacial panels installed on fixed-tilt mounts in California can produce up to 25% more energy than traditional monofacial panels.
Power Gains from Reflections
Another common misconception is that the benefits of bifacial panels are limited to large-scale solar farms with reflective surfaces such as water or white roofing. However, bifacial panels can produce power gains from both above and below the panel, making them suitable for a variety of settings, including residential and commercial rooftops. For example, a study by the University of California, Berkeley found that bifacial panels installed on a commercial rooftop in California produced an average of 15% more energy than traditional monofacial panels.
Cost-Effectiveness
Some stakeholders believe that bifacial panels are more expensive than traditional monofacial panels, making them a less attractive option for many solar projects. However, the cost-effectiveness of bifacial panels has improved significantly in recent years, making them a viable option for a wider range of projects. For example, a report by Wood Mackenzie found that the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for bifacial panels is now comparable to or even lower than traditional monofacial panels in many regions.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.