Quick Answer
Upgrading to a more expensive rangefinder can be worthwhile for serious hunters, as it often provides improved accuracy, longer maximum ranges, and advanced features like angle compensation, but only if you can justify the cost based on your specific hunting needs.
When to Upgrade: Features and Performance
If you’re a serious hunter who frequently hunts at long ranges, in challenging terrain, or in situations where accuracy is critical, a more expensive rangefinder may be worth considering. Look for models with advanced features like angle compensation, which can help you accurately compensate for the angle between your target and the ground. For example, a rangefinder like the Leupold RX-1200i offers 1/8th of a MOA angle compensation, while the Bushnell Elite 1 Mile Rangefinder offers a more precise 1/4 MOA angle compensation.
Understanding Ranging Mode: Arc or Line of Sight
Ranging modes, such as arc or line of sight, can greatly impact the accuracy of your shot. Arc mode takes into account the angle between the target and the ground, while line of sight mode simply returns a straight-line measurement. If you’re hunting with a rifle, line of sight mode may be sufficient, but if you’re hunting with a bow, arc mode is often a better choice, as it provides a more accurate measurement of the distance to your target.
Maximum Range and Budget Considerations
When it comes to maximum range, the difference between a budget-friendly rangefinder and a more expensive one can be significant. For example, the Nikon Monarch 7 7x35 Rangefinder has a maximum range of 1,500 yards, while the Leupold RX-1200i has a maximum range of 1,200 yards. However, if you’re not hunting at ranges beyond 500 yards, the more expensive rangefinder may not be worth the cost. Ultimately, the decision to upgrade to a more expensive rangefinder should be based on your specific hunting needs and budget.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.