Quick Answer
The .360 Buckhammer and .35 Remington are both suitable cartridges for deer hunting, but the .360 Buckhammer has a slightly heavier bullet and more powder capacity, resulting in more kinetic energy and a flatter trajectory. This makes the .360 Buckhammer potentially more effective at longer ranges. However, the .35 Remington's recoil is generally milder.
Ballistic Comparison
The .360 Buckhammer has a 200-grain bullet and 43.7 grains of powder, while the .35 Remington has a 200-grain bullet and 38 grains of powder. This gives the .360 Buckhammer a muzzle velocity of 2,300 feet per second, compared to the .35 Remington’s 2,170 feet per second. The .360 Buckhammer also has a flatter trajectory, with a 200-yard drop of 5.5 inches and a 300-yard drop of 18.5 inches, compared to the .35 Remington’s 7.5 inches and 25.5 inches, respectively.
Hunting Practicality
For hunting, the .35 Remington’s lighter recoil is a benefit when hunting in dense terrain or for hunters with smaller frames. However, the .360 Buckhammer’s greater kinetic energy and flatter trajectory make it more effective at longer ranges and in areas with dense cover. In terms of hunting practicality, the .360 Buckhammer is a better choice for hunters who can handle its recoil and are willing to take advantage of its longer-range capabilities.
Rifle Platform
Both cartridges can be used in a variety of rifle platforms, but the .360 Buckhammer is typically chambered in larger, more heavy-duty rifles due to its increased powder capacity and recoil. The .35 Remington, on the other hand, can be used in lighter rifles, making it a better choice for hunters who want a more manageable rifle. Ultimately, the choice between the two cartridges depends on the hunter’s personal preference and hunting style.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.