Quick Answer
Bifacial solar panels have a slightly lower lifespan compared to traditional monofacial panels, with an average degradation rate of 0.4-0.6% per year versus 0.3-0.5% per year for monofacial panels.
Bifacial Degradation Rates
Bifacial solar panels degrade at a slightly higher rate than monofacial panels due to the additional surface area exposed to the environment. Studies have shown that bifacial panels can degrade up to 10% more over their lifespan, although this is still a relatively small difference. For example, a 15-year-old bifacial panel might retain 85% of its original efficiency, compared to 90% for a monofacial panel.
Impact of Back-Side Degradation
Back-side degradation is a significant factor in bifacial solar panel lifespan, with some studies suggesting that up to 50% of the additional degradation can be attributed to back-side losses. To mitigate this, manufacturers often implement specialized back-surface treatments to reduce degradation. For example, some panels use a reflective coating to direct any stray light back to the front surface, maximizing energy production.
Comparison to Monofacial Panels
While bifacial panels may degrade slightly faster than monofacial panels, they often make up for this with increased energy production due to their ability to harness light from both sides. In many cases, bifacial panels can produce up to 25% more electricity than monofacial panels, making them a popular choice for installations with plenty of space and optimal sunlight exposure. However, it’s essential to carefully consider the panel’s design, installation, and maintenance requirements to ensure optimal performance and longevity.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.