Common misconceptions about intentional communities—what are they?

Lack of Diversity in Resource Sharing

Many people assume that intentional communities share all resources equally, but this is not always the case. In some communities, members may choose to share certain resources, such as a kitchen or tools, but not others, like personal space or income. For example, the Twin Oaks Community in Virginia, USA, shares resources like meals and childcare, but members are also encouraged to have their own income and personal space.

Common Misconceptions about Technology

Some people believe that intentional communities reject modern technology or live off the grid without any modern conveniences. However, many intentional communities incorporate technology into their lives, such as solar panels, rainwater harvesting systems, and internet access. For example, the Earthship Community in Taos, New Mexico, USA, is built into the sides of hills and uses solar and wind power to generate electricity. Members also use composting toilets and graywater systems to conserve water.

Variability in Community Structure and Goals

Intentional communities come in many different shapes and sizes, and their goals can vary widely. Some communities may be focused on environmental sustainability, while others may prioritize social justice or personal growth. For example, the Zapatista Cooperatives in Chiapas, Mexico, are a network of autonomous communities that work together to promote social justice and economic independence. In contrast, the ecovillage of Crystal Waters in Queensland, Australia, is focused on sustainable living and community development.