Quick Answer
Using a .17 Remington for larger game animals is not recommended due to its relatively low energy transfer and potential for a non-lethal shot. This caliber is generally best suited for smaller game like varmints, rodents, and rabbits. In some jurisdictions, it may be prohibited for larger game.
Effective Range and Energy Transfer
The .17 Remington is capable of delivering impressive accuracy at longer ranges, but its low kinetic energy and small diameter bullet can make it inadequate for larger game. At 100 yards, a .17 Remington bullet typically has around 200-250 ft-lbs of energy, which is insufficient to reliably drop larger mammals. For comparison, a typical deer hunting caliber like the 308 Winchester has around 1500 ft-lbs of energy at 100 yards.
Shot Placement and Wounding
Even if a larger game animal is hit with a .17 Remington, the risk of a non-lethal shot is high due to the bullet’s small diameter and lack of expansion. A poorly placed shot can result in a wounded animal that may escape or require extensive tracking. In contrast, larger calibers tend to produce more damage and are less likely to result in a wounding shot.
Alternative Options for Larger Game
If you’re looking for a smaller caliber for larger game, consider the 22-250 Remington or the 220 Swift. These cartridges offer higher velocities and more energy transfer than the .17 Remington, making them more suitable for larger game. However, it’s essential to note that even these calibers may not be sufficient for larger animals, and a more powerful caliber may be required for a humane and effective harvest.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.