Hunt & Live

Q&A · Hunting

Can TTSX bullets improve my odds for elk hunting?

April 5, 2026

Quick Answer

TTSX bullets can improve your odds for elk hunting by providing a high weight retention and penetration, making them effective for taking down larger game at longer ranges.

Monolithic Construction and Expansion

TTSX bullets, also known as Barnes TSX, feature a monolithic construction where the copper jacket is one piece, eliminating the need for a separate core. This design allows for a more even weight retention and penetration. In tests, Barnes TSX bullets have demonstrated up to 95% weight retention at 200 yards, which is crucial for taking down larger game like elk. Additionally, the TTSX bullet’s copper composition helps to control expansion and prevent over-penetration, reducing the risk of collateral damage.

Ballistic Performance and Range

Elk hunting often involves shots at longer ranges, and the TTSX bullet’s high ballistic coefficients (BC) make them well-suited for such scenarios. A BC of 0.5 or higher allows the bullet to maintain its velocity and trajectory, ensuring a more accurate shot. For example, a 180-grain TTSX bullet has a BC of 0.425, while a 250-grain TTSX bullet has a BC of 0.485, making them effective at ranges of up to 500 yards. This is particularly important when hunting elk, as shots can be taken from distances of 200-400 yards or more.

Hunting Applications and Recommendations

When hunting elk, it’s essential to use the right bullet weight for the job. For smaller elk, a 140-160 grain TTSX bullet is often sufficient, while larger elk may require a 200-250 grain bullet. It’s also crucial to choose the right rifle and load combination to ensure optimal performance from the TTSX bullet. For example, a Remington 700 chambered in 7mm Remington Magnum with a 180-grain TTSX bullet can deliver consistent results at ranges of up to 400 yards.

monolithic-bullets ttsx bullets improve odds hunting
Share

Find more answers

Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.