Quick Answer
Single-Axis Trackers vs Fixed Panels: Single-axis trackers typically produce 30-60% more energy than fixed panels over the course of a year, depending on location and latitude.
Understanding Single-Axis Trackers
Single-axis trackers use a motorized system to tilt panels up to 90 degrees, following the sun’s movement from east to west. This allows them to capture sunlight more efficiently throughout the day. For example, in a location with 7 hours of direct sunlight per day, a single-axis tracker can generate an additional 1.5-3.5 kWh of electricity per day compared to a fixed panel.
Energy Yield Comparison
A study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) found that single-axis trackers can increase energy production by 35-50% in the northern United States, and by 25-40% in the southern United States. This is due to the increased angle of incidence, which allows for more sunlight to be absorbed by the panels. In areas with high solar irradiance, such as the Southwest United States, single-axis trackers can produce up to 60% more energy than fixed panels.
Practical Considerations
When considering single-axis trackers, it’s essential to evaluate the cost, maintenance requirements, and space constraints. For small-scale systems, fixed panels may be a more cost-effective option, while larger systems may benefit from the increased energy production of single-axis trackers. Additionally, the choice of tracker type and motorized system will also impact the overall cost and efficiency of the system.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.