Legal Implications of Using SERE Techniques in Civilian Life?

Question

Accepted Answer

Understanding SERE Techniques SERE (Survive, Evasion, Resistance, Escape) training, developed by the US military, is designed to equip personnel with the skills to survive in hostile environments. In civilian life, some companies offer SERE courses, often marketed as “tactical self-defense” or “survival” training. These courses may teach techniques such as handcuff escape, waterboarding, and other methods intended to resist interrogation or evade capture.
The Risk of Liability The use of SERE techniques in civilian life can pose significant risks of civil liability. For example, if a civilian uses a technique intended to inflict pain or harm, such as waterboarding, and causes physical or emotional injury to another person, they may be liable for damages in a civil lawsuit. In the United States, courts have held that the use of torture or other forms of cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment is a violation of human rights and can give rise to civil liability. Furthermore, many states have laws prohibiting the use of certain techniques, such as torture or other forms of “enhanced interrogation,” and civilians who use these techniques may be subject to prosecution.
Minimizing Risk To minimize the risk of liability when using SERE techniques in civilian life, it’s essential to follow these guidelines: (1) ensure that the training is taught by a qualified instructor, (2) only use techniques that are necessary and proportionate to the circumstances, and (3) obtain proper consent from all participants, including minors and vulnerable populations. Additionally, civilians should be aware of the laws and regulations in their jurisdiction and ensure that their training complies with these requirements.