Quick Answer
While both cartridges are suitable for varmint hunting, there are differences in their ballistic performance, recoil, and hunting applications.
Cartridge Comparison
The .17 Remington and .204 Ruger are both popular varmint cartridges, but they have distinct characteristics. The .17 Remington produces a slightly flatter trajectory and has a higher velocity at longer ranges due to its smaller caliber and more efficient powder burn. For example, a .17 Remington 20-grain VMax can reach 4,200 feet per second, whereas a .204 Ruger 32-grain VMax reaches 3,950 feet per second at the muzzle.
Hunting Applications
In terms of hunting applications, the .17 Remington excels at longer ranges and for larger varmints like coyotes and prairie dogs. Its flatter trajectory and higher velocity make it ideal for shots beyond 300 yards. On the other hand, the .204 Ruger is better suited for shorter ranges and smaller varmints like rodents and rabbits, where its higher recoil and more potent bullet can be beneficial. In addition, the .204 Ruger is often preferred for hunting in thick cover due to its increased kinetic energy and ability to penetrate dense vegetation.
Rifle and Ammunition Selection
When choosing a rifle and ammunition for either cartridge, it’s essential to consider the specific hunting application and terrain. For the .17 Remington, a high-quality bolt-action rifle with a good scope is recommended, such as the Remington 700 or the Savage 110. For the .204 Ruger, a lightweight, versatile rifle with a good trigger, like the Ruger 77/204 or the Savage 110 Storm, is preferred. Ammunition selection should also be based on the specific hunting application, with lighter bullets for longer ranges and heavier bullets for shorter ranges and thicker cover.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.