Quick Answer
Some hunters prefer trapping over calling bobcats because it offers a more reliable and low-impact method of harvesting, allowing them to avoid disrupting the animal's natural behavior and habitat. Trapping also provides a higher success rate, especially in areas with high cat activity and suitable habitat. Additionally, trapping reduces the risk of wounding the animal, which is often a concern with calling.
Advantages of Trapping
Trapping offers several advantages over calling bobcats, particularly for experienced hunters. A well-placed trap in a high-traffic area can yield a significant harvest, often outperforming calling techniques. In fact, a study in the western United States found that traps accounted for over 70% of all bobcat harvests, while calling only accounted for around 20%. This disparity can be attributed to the fact that traps sit patiently in areas with high cat activity, waiting for the animal to make contact, whereas calling requires a level of cat activity and cooperation from the hunter.
Trapping Techniques and Success Rates
Successful trapping requires a thorough understanding of bobcat behavior, habitat, and patterns. Hunters who focus on areas with high cat activity, such as game trails, water sources, and food sources, are more likely to experience success. A well-placed trap, often baited with a lure or decoy, can sit in place for extended periods, allowing the hunter to maximize their chances of harvesting a cat. In one study, a trapper reported a 90% success rate over the course of a 6-month trapping season, with an average of two cats harvested per month. These statistics demonstrate the effectiveness of trapping as a bobcat hunting method.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.