Quick Answer
For hog hunting, the Pulsar Core RXQ30V thermal scope is a better choice than the Trijicon IR-Hunter 160, as it offers higher resolution and a wider field of view, making it easier to detect and track hogs in various environments.
Thermal Scope Comparison
When it comes to thermal scopes for hog hunting, both Pulsar and Trijicon offer high-quality options. However, the Pulsar Core RXQ30V stands out for its 640x480 resolution and 12°x8° field of view, which provides a clear and detailed image of the surroundings. This is particularly useful for detecting hogs at longer ranges and in dense vegetation.
Hunting Technique Considerations
To get the most out of a thermal scope for hog hunting, it’s essential to consider your hunting technique. For example, if you’re hunting in dense woods, a wider field of view is crucial for detecting hogs moving through the underbrush. In open fields, a higher resolution is more important for identifying specific features and tracking hogs at longer ranges. The Pulsar Core RXQ30V’s higher resolution and wider field of view make it well-suited for a variety of hunting scenarios.
Additional Features and Mounting Options
Both the Pulsar Core RXQ30V and the Trijicon IR-Hunter 160 offer additional features such as reticles and digital zoom. However, the Pulsar scope also includes a built-in picture-in-picture (PIP) mode, which allows you to see a magnified image of the target while still maintaining a wide field of view. This feature is particularly useful for tracking hogs in complex environments. When it comes to mounting options, both scopes can be mounted on a variety of rifles, including .223 Remington and .308 Winchester, using standard Picatinny rails.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.