Quick Answer
The .35 Remington is a good choice for brush hunting, offering sufficient power and manageable recoil, while the .45-70 Government provides more stopping power but can be more challenging to handle in thick brush. The .35 Remington is often preferred for small and medium-sized game in dense cover.
Power and Range
In terms of power, the .45-70 Government has a slightly higher muzzle energy, averaging around 1,400-1,500 ft-lbs, while the .35 Remington typically peaks at around 1,100-1,200 ft-lbs. This difference is less significant at closer ranges, typically below 100 yards, where most brush hunting takes place. For example, a .35 Remington 200-grain bullet fired from a 24-inch barrel will travel approximately 1,200 yards, but in a dense brush scenario, the effective range is much shorter.
Handling in Dense Brush
When it comes to handling in dense brush, the .35 Remington is generally preferred due to its lighter recoil and manageable size. This makes it easier to maneuver and control in tight spaces, where a larger rifle like the .45-70 can be more cumbersome. For example, a .35 Remington with a 20-inch barrel and a weight of around 7 pounds is much more manageable in dense brush than a .45-70 Government with a 24-inch barrel and a weight of around 8.5 pounds.
Practical Considerations
In practical terms, the choice between the .35 Remington and the .45-70 Government for brush hunting often comes down to personal preference and the specific needs of the hunt. If you’re hunting larger game like elk or moose, the .45-70 may be a better choice. However, if you’re hunting smaller game like deer or pigs in dense brush, the .35 Remington is often a better fit. Consider your specific needs and the terrain you’ll be hunting in when making your decision.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.