Quick Answer
Dual-Axis Trackers are best suited for remote locations with high solar irradiance, such as areas near the equator with clear skies. They are also ideal for locations with a high degree of solar variability throughout the day, as they can maximize energy production. This is particularly beneficial in regions with changing cloud cover or during seasonal shifts.
Location-Specific Considerations
Dual-Axis Trackers excel in areas with high solar irradiance, typically above 1800 kWh/m2/year. Places like Hawaii, the Middle East, and Australia are prime locations for these trackers. In these regions, the increased energy production can offset the higher upfront costs. For example, a 5 kW system in Hawaii can generate up to 12,000 kWh/year with a dual-axis tracker, compared to 9,000 kWh/year with a fixed mount.
System Design and Optimization
When designing a dual-axis tracker system, it’s essential to consider the tracking algorithm and motor efficiency. A well-designed system can achieve peak sun hours of 7-8 hours per day, resulting in up to 30% more energy production than a fixed mount. To optimize system performance, consider the following: a 10 kW system with dual-axis trackers can be designed to track the sun’s movement with an accuracy of ±1°, resulting in a 20% increase in energy production over a fixed mount.
Cost-Benefit Analysis
The cost of dual-axis trackers is typically higher than fixed mounts, but the increased energy production and longer system lifespan can offset the upfront costs. For example, a 10 kW system with dual-axis trackers may cost 15% more than a fixed mount system, but it can produce 25% more energy over its 25-year lifespan, resulting in a net savings of $12,000 over the system’s lifespan.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.