Quick Answer
Using 3-inch shells can lead to a notable decrease in follow-up shots due to reduced penetration and expansion, limiting the hunter's ability to quickly and effectively take down their quarry.
Understanding the Benefits of 3.5-Inch Shells
When choosing a shell length, consider the type of game you’re hunting and the distance you’ll be shooting from. For most hunting scenarios, a 3.5-inch shell offers a better balance between penetration and expansion. This shell length typically provides a 10-15% increase in penetration over a 3-inch shell, making it more effective at taking down larger game at longer ranges. For example, a 3.5-inch 12-gauge shell loaded with a 1 1/4-ounce load of #4 shot can reach velocities of up to 1,300 feet per second, making it suitable for hunting deer at ranges up to 50 yards.
The Impact of Reduced Expansion
A 3-inch shell often results in reduced expansion, which can lead to decreased stopping power. When a 3-inch shell fails to expand properly, the resulting wound channel may be smaller and less effective at quickly taking down the animal. In contrast, a 3.5-inch shell is more likely to expand properly, creating a larger wound channel and increasing the chances of a quick kill. For example, a 3.5-inch 12-gauge shell loaded with a 1 1/4-ounce load of #4 shot can create a wound channel up to 25% larger than a 3-inch shell, making it a more effective choice for hunting larger game.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.
