Quick Answer
A remote location is not always safer for a bug-out site, as it may be more vulnerable to isolation, lack of resources, and difficulty in retrieving supplies or receiving help.
Isolation Risk
When choosing a remote bug-out location, consider the risk of isolation. A location that’s too far from civilization may leave you stranded without access to essential resources like medical care, food, and fuel. For example, a location 5-10 miles from a nearby town or road can provide a balance between seclusion and accessibility. Use a map to calculate the exact distance and consider factors like terrain and climate that may affect travel.
Resource Security
A remote location also requires careful planning to ensure resource security. Consider stockpiling at least 6-12 months’ worth of non-perishable food and water, as well as a reliable means of generating electricity. A location with access to natural resources like a stream or river can be beneficial for water collection, but also poses risks like waterborne diseases. Use a water treatment system or stockpile water purification tablets to mitigate this risk.
Accessibility and Recovery
While a remote location may provide seclusion, it’s essential to consider how you’ll access and recover from the site. Plan for a reliable means of transportation, such as a 4x4 vehicle or a motorcycle, and stockpile fuel and spare parts. Designate a recovery route and identify potential escape routes in case of an emergency.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.