Quick Answer
Yes, there are differences in efficiency between fixed and tracking systems, with tracking systems generally producing more energy due to their ability to follow the sun's movement.
Fixed Mount Systems
Fixed mount systems, also known as pole mounts, are the most common type of solar panel installation. They provide a stable base for the solar panels to sit on, and the panels are typically angled to face the optimal direction for maximum energy production. However, since the sun’s position changes throughout the day, fixed mounts can only optimize energy production for a specific time frame. On average, fixed mounts can produce around 20-25% more energy than a standard rooftop installation.
Tracking Systems
Tracking systems, such as single-axis or dual-axis tracking systems, are designed to follow the sun’s movement throughout the day. This allows them to optimize energy production for the maximum amount of time, resulting in higher energy yields. Dual-axis tracking systems can produce up to 45% more energy than a fixed mount system, depending on the location and the amount of sunlight the area receives. Single-axis tracking systems can produce up to 30% more energy than fixed mounts.
Optimizing Pole Mount Installations
When installing pole mounts for solar panels, it’s essential to consider the local climate, available sunlight, and the height of the installation. In areas with high wind speeds or extreme weather conditions, it’s crucial to choose a sturdy pole mount that can withstand the elements. Additionally, using adjustable mounting systems can help optimize energy production by allowing the panels to be tilted and faced in different directions to maximize energy yields.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.