Benoit Style vs Traditional Tracking — Which Is Better?

Choosing the Right Method

When tracking deer in Maine, it’s essential to consider the terrain and habitat. For dense forests, the Benoit style is more effective. This method involves following a series of small signs, such as broken twigs, crushed leaves, and disturbed soil, to track the deer’s movement. By focusing on these subtle signs, you can follow the deer’s path more accurately in dense cover.

Traditional Tracking in Open Areas

In contrast, traditional tracking is better suited for open areas, such as fields and meadows. This method involves following larger signs, such as tracks, scat, and rubs, to track the deer’s movement. By focusing on these larger signs, you can follow the deer’s path more easily in open terrain. In Maine, traditional tracking is often more effective in areas with less vegetation, such as along game trails or near water sources.

Key Techniques for Benoit Style Tracking

To master the Benoit style, it’s essential to develop a keen eye for detail and to learn how to read the subtle signs left by the deer. This involves looking for signs such as broken twigs, which can indicate the direction of the deer’s movement. It also involves following the deer’s track closely, often within 6-8 inches of the deer’s footprints. By doing so, you can follow the deer’s path more accurately in dense cover and increase your chances of success.