Quick Answer
SHORTEST_ANSWER: The lifecycle cost of different types of solar trackers varies widely, with a 10-20% increase in energy production for single-axis trackers and 20-30% for dual-axis trackers, while also increasing system costs by 10-30%. The increased energy production can offset higher upfront costs, but the choice of tracker type depends on site-specific conditions and budget constraints. The lifecycle cost also depends on maintenance and repair costs over time.
Types of Solar Trackers
There are three main types of solar trackers: fixed tilt, single-axis, and dual-axis. Fixed tilt trackers have a stationary mounting system with a fixed angle, while single-axis trackers allow the solar panels to move along a single axis, typically the north-south axis. Dual-axis trackers move along two axes, both north-south and east-west, to track the sun’s movement throughout the day.
Cost Comparison
A study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) found that single-axis trackers can increase energy production by 10-20% compared to fixed tilt trackers. However, the cost of a single-axis tracker can be 10-20% higher than a fixed tilt tracker, which may not be justified for sites with low irradiance levels. Dual-axis trackers can increase energy production by 20-30% but are typically 20-30% more expensive than single-axis trackers.
Maintenance and Repair Costs
Maintenance and repair costs can vary depending on the type of tracker and site conditions. Single-axis trackers are generally easier to maintain than dual-axis trackers, which require more complex movement mechanisms. Regular maintenance can help reduce repair costs over the lifespan of the system, but the cost of maintenance can be significant, especially for large-scale solar farms.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.