Charles Mix County, SD
9,213 residents · 1,097 sq mi · 8.4/sq mi · 100% rural
About Charles Mix County
Charles Mix County is a county in the U.S. state of South Dakota. As of the 2020 census, the population was 9,373. Its county seat is Lake Andes. The county was created in 1862 and organized in 1879. It was named for Charles Eli Mix, an official of the Bureau of Indian Affairs influential in signing a peace treaty with the local Lakota Indian tribes. The easternmost approximately 60% of the county comprises the Yankton Indian Reservation.
Prepper Assessment
Living in this area presents a predominantly rural lifestyle with a low population density of 8.4 people per square mile. The climate features an annual mean temperature of 48.3°F and a growing season suitable for USDA zone 7a, allowing for a variety of crops. The county receives 25 inches of rain annually, which supports agricultural activities. However, the winters can be harsh, with lows averaging 10.8°F, which may limit year-round self-sufficiency for those unaccustomed to colder climates.
Natural hazards pose some risks, including a high likelihood of cold waves (FEMA rank 87) and winter weather (rank 84), which could impact daily living and agricultural activities. Drought (rank 85) is also a concern, potentially affecting water availability. The area's violence percentile is at 54, indicating a moderate safety level, while the cost of living appears manageable with a median home price of $163,200 and a property tax rate of 1.02%. However, with only 62% of households having broadband, connectivity may be limited.
This county may be a good fit for those seeking a quiet, rural lifestyle and who are prepared for cold winters and the occasional drought. Individuals with experience in farming or self-sufficient living may thrive here, especially given the affordable housing market. However, those requiring consistent internet access or who are unprepared for severe winter conditions may find it challenging. The hidden gem is the potential for a strong sense of community in a rural setting, while the dealbreaker could be the limited broadband access.